data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbaca/fbaca2f7a2bb16afdd8ab86e0f6088f592b1162d" alt="Discovery family online"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd188/bd188a2108d1ea4aa5285b7f172b3d9d746a2642" alt="discovery family online discovery family online"
AdamDeanHall ( talk) 22:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC) Who is the wisenheimer who moved it to "Discovery Kids" when they know very well that is not the name of the network? - Jasonbres ( talk) 04:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC) Support- John123521 ( Talk- Contib.) RA 05:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC) The wisenheimer who moved it to "Discovery Kids" is Rigby77181. Also, "Discovery Kids" is NOT the name of this network.
#Discovery family online tv#
TV channel) → Discovery Family – The word "Channel" doesn't belong in the Discovery Family logo. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 21:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)ĭiscovery Kids (U.S. I've closed this a few days early since there's been no opposition, and the initial move that this reverted seems to have been vandalism. The result of the move request was: page moved. No further edits should be made to this section. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. ViperSnake151 Talk 01:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC) 4th point is what I would go with, the article had been there for long, like 7 months, but still poorly written. It's still a children's channel, but they broadened the genre so it did not have to be all traditional Discovery Channel-type stuff anymore. not much in reality (by the time Destination America was ready to launch, the channel had pretty much dropped all its environmental programs and was just airing random reruns of stuff from other Discovery networks), and we kept those as one article too. This was as much of a change as Planet Green turning into Destination America, i.e.Logopedia seems to indicate that there was a countdown clock between the new networks, so they were treating it on-air as a re-launch. There was continuity in the transition it didn't just sign-off for a few days, and then come back up as The Hub a few days later, nor was it launched by phasing out a channel devoted to a dying genre of TV in exchange for your new preschool channel.Discovery Family feels like a second incarnation of what they were originally trying to do with Discovery Kids, so, again, it's good to keep it all together.Given that we pretty much have the complete history of its time as The Hub here, I felt it would be better to treat its predecessor as part of its overall history too, without any compromise. The Discovery Kids article was short and poorly-sourced.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db156/db15606dee45d5262153211a68ba50d5e8780e26" alt="discovery family online discovery family online"
There's a number of reasons why I merged the article into the Hub Network article.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbaca/fbaca2f7a2bb16afdd8ab86e0f6088f592b1162d" alt="Discovery family online"